Rapid Advancement in Enteral Nutrition Does Not Affect Systemic Inflammation and Insulin Homeostasis Following Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.

Labatt Family Heart Centre, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. Cardiovascular Data Management Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Labatt Family Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. Labatt Family Heart Centre, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2020;(7):e441-e448

Other resources

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To determine impact of enteral nutrition delivery on the relationship among inflammation, insulin resistance, and outcomes following pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. DESIGN Pilot, randomized study analyzed according to intention-to-treat analysis. SETTING Pediatric cardiac ICU. PATIENTS Infants (≤ 6 mo) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS Patients randomly assigned to receive rapid escalation to enteral nutrition reaching goal feeds by 27 hours or standard feeding practice reaching goal feeds by 63 hours. Feeds were initiated on the first postoperative day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Fifty patients were randomized equally to study arms. Patients were a median (interquartile range) of 16 days old (7-110 d old), undergoing biventricular surgery (88%) with a median cardiopulmonary bypass time of 125 minutes (105-159 min). Serial blood samples were drawn before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac ICU admission, and every 12 hours (up to 96 hr) for glucose, insulin, and cytokines (interleukin-1α, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α) levels. Glucose-insulin ratio was calculated to quantify insulin resistance. Patient characteristics, time to enteral nutrition initiation, enteral nutrition interruptions, and insulin administration were similar across intervention arms. FF reached goal feeds at similar intervals as standard feeding (39 hr [30-60 hr] vs 60 hr [21-78 hr]; p = 0.75). No difference in cytokine, insulin, or glucose-insulin ratio was noted between groups. Higher inflammation was associated with increased glucose-insulin ratio and higher risk of adverse events. In multivariable models of interleukin-8, FF was associated with increased glucose-insulin ratio (estimate of effect [95% CI], 0.152 [0.033-0.272]; p = 0.013). Although higher interleukin-8 was associated with an elevated risk of adverse event, this relationship was possibly mitigated by FF (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.086 [0.002-1.638]; p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS A FF strategy was not associated with changes to early enteral nutrition delivery. Inflammation, insulin resistance, and morbidity were similar, but FF may modify the relationship between inflammation and adverse event. Multicenter nutrition studies are possible and necessary in this vulnerable population.

Methodological quality

Metadata

MeSH terms : Inflammation